JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 5, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Accion De Tutela De Javier Martin Ruico Rodriguez Vs Sociedad Bhp Billinton Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se resuelve la solicitud elevada por la sociedad Cerro Matoso S.A., relacionada con la declaratoria de nulidad de todo lo actuado en el proceso de la referencia, por la presunta violación de su derecho de defensa, por la falta de notificación directa.

DENEGADA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el apoderado judicial de la sociedad Cerro Matoso S.A. (Carrera 13 NO. 75 - 20, Of. 407), dentro del tramite de revision de la accion de tutela T-4.126.294.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR la presente providencia a las partes demandante y demandada y a todas las involucradas en el presente asunto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.